Using virtual patients to explore the clinical reasoning skills of medical students A mixed methods study

Funded by

The Health Foundation Logo

3 April 2021

Published journal: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

Background

Improving clinical reasoning skills—the thought processes used by clinicians to formulate appropriate questions and diagnoses—is essential for reducing missed diagnostic opportunities. The electronic Clinical Reasoning Educational Simulation Tool (eCREST) was developed to improve the clinical reasoning of future physicians. A feasibility trial demonstrated acceptability and potential impacts; however, the processes by which students gathered data were unknown.

Objective

This study aims to identify the data gathering patterns of final year medical students while using eCREST and how eCREST influences the patterns.

Methods

A mixed methods design was used. A trial of eCREST across 3 UK medical schools (N=148) measured the potential effects of eCREST on data gathering. A qualitative think-aloud and semistructured interview study with 16 medical students from one medical school identified 3 data gathering strategies: Thorough, Focused, and Succinct. Some had no strategy. Reanalysis of the trial data identified the prevalence of data gathering patterns and compared patterns between the intervention and control groups. Patterns were identified based on 2 variables that were measured in a patient case 1 month after the intervention: the proportion of Essential information students identified and the proportion of irrelevant information gathered (Relevant). Those who scored in the top 3 quartiles for Essential but in the lowest quartile for Relevant displayed a Thorough pattern. Those who scored in the top 3 quartiles for Relevant but in the lowest quartile for Essential displayed a Succinct pattern. Those who scored in the top 3 quartiles on both variables displayed a Focused pattern. Those whose scores were in the lowest quartile on both variables displayed a Nonspecific pattern.

Results

The trial results indicated that students in the intervention group were more thorough than those in the control groups when gathering data. The qualitative data identified data gathering strategies and the mechanisms by which eCREST influenced data gathering. Students reported that eCREST promoted thoroughness by prompting them to continuously reflect and allowing them to practice managing uncertainty. However, some found eCREST to be less useful, and they randomly gathered information. Reanalysis of the trial data revealed that the intervention group was significantly more likely to display a Thorough data gathering pattern than controls (21/78, 27% vs 6/70, 9%) and less likely to display a Succinct pattern (13/78, 17% vs 20/70, 29%; χ23=9.9; P=.02). Other patterns were similar across groups.

Conclusions

Qualitative data suggested that students applied a range of data gathering strategies while using eCREST and that eCREST encouraged thoroughness by continuously prompting the students to reflect and manage their uncertainty. Trial data suggested that eCREST led students to demonstrate more Thorough data gathering patterns. Virtual patients that encourage thoroughness could help future physicians avoid missed diagnostic opportunities and enhance the delivery of clinical reasoning teaching.

Citation 

Plackett R, Kassianos AP, Timmis J, Sheringham J, Schartau P, Kambouri M
Using Virtual Patients to Explore the Clinical Reasoning Skills of Medical Students: Mixed Methods Study
J Med Internet Res 2021;23(6):e24723

doi: 10.2196/24723
PMID: 34085940
PMCID: 8214179

You might also like...

Blog

Enabling service transformation in practice: reflections on the Wade-Gery review

Blog

Will the Wade-Gery review enable the NHS to make a leap forwards on tech and data? Tim Horton...

Press release

Social care COVID-19 deaths highlight need for government to go further on funding and reform

Press release

Health Foundation response to Office for National Statistics data on deaths in the care sector in...

Consultation response

Briefing on the Health and Care Bill: House of Lords Second Reading

Consultation response

Our briefing for the House of Lords on the Health and Care Bill 2021/22.

Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101 copy

Get social

Do we need a vision for the future of primary care? Hear from Professor Katherine Checkland at @OfficialUoM on our… https://t.co/1FQNTw4VEc

Follow us on Twitter
Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101

Work with us

We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.

View current vacancies
Artboard 101 copy 2

The Q community

Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.

Find out more